|
Wisco v. Yoder
p. 1012 F: Amish community won’t send kids to public school but law requires kids to go until they’re 16. Religious beliefs dictate that sending them out could harm their salvation. I: Despite a substantial gov’t interest, can the Amish withhold their children from school for religious reasons? H: Yes R: The Amish proved that their religion was established and had bearing on the case. They also proved that the children didn’t need the schooling to function in Amish society and if the society were to fall apart they could function in the modern world. Ru: ? Sherbert v. Verner
p. 1020 F: A woman is fired b/c she won't work on the Sabbath (saturday). Then files for unemployment and is denied for the same reason. I: Does Free Exercise secure her ability to claim unemployment? H: Yes. R: The gov't interest was valid, but it infringed on 1 religion and not all, so it is unconst. Ru: Dissent: This decision infringes on mothers who can't find a babysitter on saturdays. Smith v. ...Oregon
p. 1046 F: The State of Oregon wants to include Peyote used in religion to be excluded in unemployment claims and criminally prosecutable. I: Does this impinge on the free exercise clause? H: Yes. R: Blah. Ru: The religious info doesn't matter if the law is: |
Assc, Parties and Pol Campaigns
Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Hurley v. Irish-American GLIB Commercial Speech Red Lion Broadcasting v. FCC Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada 44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island Central Hudson v. Public Service Commission Defamation and Torts Gertz v. Robert Welch Inc. Time Inc. v. Hill NY Times v. Sullivan Hustler v. Falwell Bartnicki v. Vopper Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders Establishment Clause Alleghany v. ACLU Lemon v. Kurtzman First Amendment Theories Bickel Kairys Gitlow v. NY US v. O'Brien Miton Friedman John Stuart Mill Free Exercise Smith v. ...Oregon Sherbert v. Verner Wisco v. Yoder Illegal Advocacy NYT Company v. US (Pentagon Papers) Dennis v. U.S. Whitney v. California Abrams v. U.S. Sept 11, 1st Amend, and the Advocacy of Violence Hess v. Indiana Brandenburg v. Ohio Schenck v. US Lecture Notelets 4/4/02 2/26/02 2/11/02 Section 1/24/02 Offensive Language and Hate Speech Wisconsin v. Mitchell R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul Cohen v. California Texas v. Johnson Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire Public Property and Sector Southworth Rosenberger v. University of Virginia Abood v. Detroit Education Tinker v. Des Moines School District Rock Against Racism Perry Education v. Teacher's Association Rust v. Sullivan Sexual Material Renton v. Playtime Theatres Pico Reno v. ACLU Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton Miller v. California Stanley v. Georgia Roth v. U.S. |