We now know that Mr. Lieberman will be running for president in 2004 and I am in a quandry. On the one hand, he is a huge conservative and his politics are generally the polar opposite of mine. On the other he is both a minority and a jew, which is something we have never had in office. If this were a perfect world that was completely color blind then I would not vote for Joe, but it is not. The truth is, it would be great to have someone in office who is not a Christian. I know he is still a "stuffy old white guy" but we must take baby steps.
This whole perdicament reminds of when black people first started appearing on television and in movies. Although people disliked the stereotypical or derogetory roles they played, many applauded their presence alone. There was a lot of contention over the subject and I am sure this will happen again over the next two years.
So I'll ask you: should race and ethnicity play a role in your vote for the president?
12/30/02 4:06 PM
No. While I think such characteristics will undoubtedly influence a decision for many, we should be voting for ideas, aptitude and overall platform. As a woman, I may be more interested in women candidates, but I would never put my vote behind a candidate whose political tendancies do not agree with mine, or if she is simply not the best for the job. There has never been a woman president or vice president for that matter. Does that mean all women should throw support behind the first female candidate for such an office despite personal views? Clearly, this idea is absurd. If you support Lieberman's policies and ideas, then he deserves your vote. But if you support him only because of a common characteristic despite his ability as a leader (and there is another candidate more skilled whose views you do support) then you are an irresponsible voter.
12/30/02 6:45 PM
Point well taken. I'd like to clarify that I hoped to emphasize the concept of minorities in general rather than ones that I identify with. I would have the same qualms with a racial minority or a woman candidate. And to expand on your point, it does make the most sense to vote for the best political candidate and I think that in this case, as opposed to the example I discussed, the weight of the decision is too great to worry about social and ethical ramifications. If someone is the best candidate and will do the best job for our country, then he/she/it should be the president.
12/30/02 7:35 PM
yes matty, "it" for president! it doesn't have to be a human or even a SENTIENT BEING! ergo..
PIZZA FOR PREZ 2004!!!!!!!
12/31/02 9:15 PM
I was listening to the report on NPR where hey were discussing "Is America ready For A Jewish President?". Quite frankly no. I would vote for someone who is Jewish and who similiar political beliefs, but wouldn't vote for someone just because they are Jewish. Somewhat on the same line of thinking, I would vote for Colin Powell if he ran for president, even though he is a Republican (I am a mid to left leaning Democrat) but not because he is black. He is about the only one in the current administration who is sensible. I guess we'll hav to wait and see who comes out on top in New Hampshire once the "Seven Dwarfs" fight it out again.